26th september 2009

the why

the lover instilled in the writer a degradation-to-life assertion

there is only one more degree of degradation-to-life assertion that is more destructive to life before it crosses over into death-outcome realities

(the reality it produced would be a nightmare to a child)

the lover done what he did to broaden the writers capacity to occupy a greater range of love/life’s conjugate positions

which in turn means the writer’s genetic compatibility is greater

however the writer’s compatibility does not extend to encompass death-outcome-assertions nor does it last forever

it is gradually being erased

(it isn’t known at this moment how long it takes to erase)

as evolution occurs

it is an absolute necessity that degradation-to-life assertions be recognized and special considerations given to making sure they do not degrade any further

yet another priority in a list of priorities that isn’t getting smaller

there’s obviously no sense of urgency to prevent unnatural death from occurring

it can only be hoped that generation 3000 sees things differently

the how…